Respect a Man's Choice
Too
By Jeffery M. Leving and Glenn Sacks
© 2006

In Kai Ma’s recent AlterNet column
“The Difference Between a Womb and a Wallet” she applauds
a U.S. District Court judge’s quick, contemptuous dismissal of Matt Dubay’s “Roe v. Wade for Men” lawsuit. Dubay sought to wipe out the
child support payments he is obligated to make to an ex-girlfriend
who, he says, used a fallacious claim of infertility to deceive him
into getting her pregnant.
In opposing “Choice for Men,” Ma asserts that a “woman's decision to
terminate a pregnancy is not the equivalent of a man's choice to
financially opt out of fatherhood.” She cites the pain and
discomfort of pregnancy, and the way motherhood “may limit our
mobility or careers.” These problems are very real; however, so are
the problems created when men are saddled with child support
obligations.
According to Men's Health magazine, 100,000 men each year are jailed
for alleged nonpayment of child support. Federal Office of Child
Support Enforcement data reveal that 70% of those behind on payments
earn poverty level wages. The “Most Wanted Deadbeat Dad” lists put
out by most states are used both for police actions and to hunt and
shame “deadbeats” through newspaper ads and publicity campaigns.
These lists are largely comprised of uneducated African-American and
Latino men with occupation descriptions like "laborer," "maintenance
man" and "roofer."
Ma dismisses the burden of child support as being “a few hundred
dollars a month.” However, in California, AlterNet’s home state, a
noncustodial father of two earning a modest $3,800 a month in net
income pays $1,300 a month in child support. The money--almost
$300,000 over 18 years--is tax-free to the custodial mother. One can
reasonably debate whether this sum is appropriate or excessive. One
cannot reasonably dismiss it as being insignificant.
Ma portrays children as a mother’s albatross, forgetting that
parenting is also the greatest joy a person can experience in life.
Yes, in single mother homes the mother bears the burden of most of
the childrearing, but the mothers also experience the lion’s share
of the joys and benefits of having children. Noncustodial fathers
are not so fortunate—they’re usually permitted only a few days a
month to spend with their kids. Once mom finds a new man, they’re
often pushed out entirely in favor of the child’s “new dad.”
Ma condemns men who “lie, deceive, break their promises, or pull a
180…who agree to marry but don't,” and laments that “millions of
women” have been “trapped into single motherhood for life with,
often, next to no recourse.” Yet according to a randomized study of
46,000 divorce cases published in the American Law and Economics
Review, two‑thirds of all divorces involving couples with children
are initiated by mothers, not fathers, and in only 6% of cases did
the women claim to be divorcing cruel or abusive husbands.
The out-of-wedlock birth rate in the United States hovers around
33%--given the wide variety of contraceptive and reproductive
choices women enjoy, this can hardly be blamed primarily on men.
Yes, in some of these cases the mother and father shared a
relationship which the mother (and the father) may have expected
would become a marriage. Yet these relationships fail for many
reasons besides male perfidy. These include: youth; economic
pressure and the lack of living wage jobs (how many couples fight
over money?); and the mothers’ post-partum depression and
mood-swings. It’s doubtful that many men really wake up in the
morning and say to themselves “my child loves me and needs me, my
girlfriend loves me and needs me—I’m outta here.”
Ma says men “shouldn't be able to choose to abandon that child in
the lurch.” Yet 1.5 million American women legally walk away from
motherhood every year through adoption, abortion or abandonment. In
over 40 states mothers can completely opt out of motherhood by
returning unwanted babies to the hospital shortly after birth. If
men like Dubay are deadbeats and deserters, what are these women?
Whenever a child is born outside of the context of a loving,
two-parent family, there are no good solutions. Ma overstates her
case, but she is correct that “Choice for Men” is a flawed solution.
However, the current regime, which provides women with a variety of
choices and men with none, is also flawed.
Dubay's conduct is not particularly admirable, and he's certainly
not a candidate for father of the year; however, he does have a
point. Over the past four decades women’s advocates have
successfully made the case that it is wrong to force a pregnancy on
an unwilling mother. Despite the backlash against Dubay, hopefully
his lawsuit will result in a greater societal awareness that it is
also wrong to force a pregnancy on an unwilling father.

Jeffery M. Leving is one of
America's most prominent family law attorneys. He is the author of
the book Fathers' Rights:
Hard-hitting and Fair Advice for Every Father Involved in a Custody
Dispute. His website is
www.dadsrights.com.
Glenn Sacks'
columns on men's and fathers' issues have appeared in dozens of
America's largest newspapers. Glenn can be reached via his website
at
www.GlennSacks.com or via email at
Glenn@GlennSacks.com.
Copyright 2006 Glenn
Sacks, all rights reserved