I wait for my son as he stands in line after school
to get his daily behavior report. The first grade students are fidgety
in the line, which is probably why they are the "bad kids" who need
the behavior reports to begin with. All 10 of these children have one
thing in common--they're all boys.
Soon the little boys will wear the same sad faces
that are on their behavior reports, next to the teacher's angry
exclamation points. Like my son, they will trudge home and await
punishment, knowing, of course, that punishment is what they deserve.
Maybe it will be an angry scolding, or a "now your friend can't come
over this afternoon." Maybe it will be yard work, or loss of their new
toy. There will be tears and wails, but after a while the tears and
wails will stop as the boys resign themselves to their fate.
It's good that these little boys learn this lesson
about themselves and school early, because, for many of them, school
will never be any different. Boys at all levels are far more likely
than girls to be disciplined, suspended, held back, or expelled. By
high school the typical boy is a year and a half behind the typical
girl in reading and writing, and is less likely to graduate high
school, go to college, or graduate college than a typical girl. Boys
are three times as likely to receive a diagnosis of attention-deficit
hyperactivity disorder as girls, four times as likely to commit
suicide, and far more likely to fall victim to teen drug or alcohol
abuse.
By every index, our schools are failing our boys.
Yet little is being done about it, in part because of the societal
misconception that schools favor boys, a misconception created by the
American Association of University Women's (AAUW) 1992 report "How
Schools Shortchange Girls." The report's claim of a "girl crisis" was
widely publicized, the Ms. Foundation declared "Take Our Daughters to
Work Day," and Congress passed the $360 million Gender Equity in
Education Act.
According to Diane Ravitch, author and former US
Department of Education official, "The AAUW report was completely
wrong. What was so bizarre is that it came out right at the time that
girls had just overtaken boys in almost every area ... it was like
calling a wedding a funeral.... There were all these special programs
put in place for girls, and no one paid any attention to boys."
Christina Hoff Sommers, author of The War Against
Boys, notes that "The research commonly cited to support claims of
male privilege [in schools]...is riddled with errors. Almost none of
it has been published in peer-reviewed professional journals, and some
of the data has mysteriously disappeared."
There are many dissidents within the educational
establishment who saw through the illusory "girl crisis" and who have
called attention to the plight of boys. Educational Consultant Joe
Manthey, who filed a highly publicized gender discrimination lawsuit
over "Take Our Daughters to Work Day" earlier this year, says:
"If there's anybody who needed special programs and
special funding from Congress, it's boys, not girls. We need more
programs for students with learning disabilities, and for retarded,
emotionally disturbed, and schizophrenic students--most of whom are
boys."
Michelle Ventimiglia, director of a Los Angeles day
care center, says "our schools simply aren't made for boys. I see this
every September when my students go into elementary school. Our
schools are made for children who can sit still with their hands
folded, who aren't distracted by a bug on the wall, who keep quiet and
do what you tell them to do even if it is boring. Most girls do fine
in this environment, but many boys don't.
"Children need physically connected activities,
particularly boys. They learn best by doing. An early elementary
school student can learn a ton of math and geometry skills, as well as
problem solving and social skills, from LEGOs, building blocks, and
wood working projects. Cooking projects are also very useful.
"Boys love these types of hands-on lessons and
activities, but too often teachers find it easier to simply give them
worksheets instead. And now, with so much time being devoted to
testing and preparing for testing, teachers' repertoires are even more
limited, which is bad for children, particularly boys."
Of course, as parents we suffer along with our
children, and as our boys are punished we are punished, too. Every day
as I pick my son up from school I hope for a good behavior report that
can be celebrated with ice cream or a trip to the park. More often I
face what I call the "boy parent dilemma"--when my son is "bad" do I
punish him because he can't fit into a structure that clearly isn't
suited to little boys? Or do I withhold punishment or censure and in
so doing undercut the teacher's authority?
I've agonized over this question again and again,
but I always decide that it is my duty to support the teacher. But
I'll never forget the sadness of my little son who sobs quietly in the
back seat after school because I punished him for his bad behavior
report. Why did I punish him? Because I simply couldn't think of
anything else to do.