 |
|






Steven Stosny, PhD, is Director of
CompassionPower.
His interest in emotional regulation in general and in the healing
power of compassion in particular grew from his childhood in a
violent home.
Dr. Stosny is a consultant in family violence for the Prince
George’s County Circuit and District courts, as well as for several
mental health agencies.
He has treated more than 3,000 clients with various forms of anger,
abuse, and violence.
|
|
 |
Guest Article... |
Anger at Children: Who Has
the Power
by
Steven Stosny, PhD © 2004

Every parent since the
beginning of time has been painfully aware that children can
do a great many things to irritate, frustrate, and otherwise
turn the pleasant feelings of their caretakers into moods
from hell. Those same creatures who look like little
darlings when they sleep can almost at their whim produce
headaches, upset stomachs, jangled nerves, strained muscles,
aching bones, and overloaded emotional and sensory circuits.
But there’s one thing that even the most exuberant or
obstinate of children cannot do: They can’t make us angry.
They cannot force us to give up internal regulation of our
emotional experience. To understand this scientific fact
that seems to fly in the face of common sense, consider the
psychobiological function of anger.
Why Anger is a Problem in Families
An automatic response triggered whenever we feel threatened,
anger is the most powerful of all emotional experience. The
only emotion that activates every muscle group and organ of
the body, anger exists to mobilize the instinctual fight or
flight response meant to protect us from predators. Of
course, our children are not predators. For the vast
majority of problems in family life, anger constitutes
overkill and under-think. Applying this survival-level fight
or flight response to everyday problems of family living is
like using a rock to turn off a lamp or a tank to repair a
computer.
Is anyone really stupid enough to turn off a lamp with a
rock? When angry, everybody is that stupid. The problem has
nothing to do with intelligence, it has to do with how hurt
we are. Anger is always a reaction to hurt. It can be
physical pain, which is why, when you bang your thumb with a
hammer while trying to hang a picture, you don’t pray.
Far more often, though, anger is a reaction to psychological
hurt or threat of hurt, in the form of a diminished sense of
self. Vulnerability to psychological hurt depends entirely
on how you feel about yourself. When your sense of self is
weak or disorganized, anything can make you irritable or
angry. When it’s solid and well-integrated, the insults and
frustrations of life just roll off your back.
For instance, if you’ve had a bad day, if you’re feeling
guilty, a little bit like a failure, or just disregarded,
devalued, or irritable, you might come home to find your
kid’s shoes in the middle of the floor and respond with:
"That lazy, selfish, inconsiderate, little brat!" Yet you
can come home after a great day of feeling fine about
yourself, see the same shoes in the middle of the floor and
think, "Oh, that’s just Jimmy or Sally," and not think twice
about it.
The difference in your reaction to the child’s behavior lies
entirely within you and depends completely on how you feel
about yourself. In the first case the child’s behavior seems
to diminish your sense of self: "If he cared about me, he
wouldn’t do this; if my own kid doesn’t care about me, I
must not be worth caring about." The anger is to punish the
child for your diminished sense of self. In the second
instance, the child’s behavior does not diminish your sense
of personal importance, value, power, and lovability. So
there is no need for anger. You don’t need a tank to solve
the problem of the shoes in the middle of the floor. Rather,
the problem to be solved is how to teach the child to be
more considerate in his behavior; you won’t do that by
humiliating him because you feel humiliated. His reaction to
humiliation will be the same as yours: an inability see the
other person’s perspective, an overwhelming urge to blame,
and an impulse for revenge or punishment.
Modeling Anger Regulation for
Children
Although their intellectual maturity is far less advanced
than that of their parents, children experience anger for
the same reasons as adults, mostly to defend the sense of
self from pain and temporary diminishment. At the moment of
anger, both children and adults feel bad about themselves.
Making angry people feel worse about themselves will only
make things worse. Rather, children must learn from their
parents that the sense of self is internal and can be
regulated only within themselves. They must restore their
own sense of core value while respecting the rights of other
people, which means regulating the impulse for revenge
through validation of the hurt causing the urge for revenge,
and through understanding the perspective of the person at
whom the anger is directed. They will only learn to do this
by watching their parents do it.
Self-Compassion and Compassion for
Others
Mastery of the three steps of self-compassion and compassion
for others makes us virtually immune to the ill-effects of
anger. The first step of self-compassion is seeing beneath
the symptom or defense (anger, anxiety, manipulation,
obnoxious behavior) to the cause, which is some form of core
hurt (feeling unimportant, disregarded, accused, devalued,
guilty, untrustworthy, rejected, powerless, unlovable).
Second, the core hurt must be validated (this is how I feel
at this moment), and, third, changed (this behavior or event
or disappointment or mistake does not mean that I’m
unimportant, not valuable or lovable.) Compassion for others
is recognizing that their symptoms, defenses, and obnoxious
behavior come from a core hurt, validating it, and
supporting them while they change it. Compassion does not
excuse obnoxious behavior. Rather, it keeps us from
attacking the already wounded person, which allows focus on
changing the undesired behavior.
Anger Regulation
Here are a few of the common activators of anger, which we
call core hurts: feeling disregarded, unimportant, accused,
guilty, untrustworthy, devalued, rejected, powerless,
unworthy of love. Once activated, core hurts put the sense
of self at stake in solving the problem, which greatly
distorts thinking, blows the problem out of proportion, and
increases the emotional intensity of the response. Of course
the child is responsible only for his/her behavior, not your
sense of self.
To regulate anger, we must reduce the sensitivity of these
activators. We must learn to view anger as a signal, not to
assign blame to our children for tripping the activator, but
to look within the self to reset the activated core hurt,
i.e., to restore Core Value, a sense of personal adequacy
and worthiness. With the sense of self no longer at stake,
the problem, no longer a source of self-diminishment, can be
solved for what it is: a call for more attention/effort, an
inconvenience, disappointment, or mistake.
Emotional regulation skills can be learned fairly quickly in
three concentrated learning sessions, with consistent
practice between sessions. But whether learned through
training or through personal experience that internally
regulates anger activators, successful parenting, personal
happiness, optimal work efficiency, physical and
psychological health, and the capacity to sustain viable
attachment relationships demands self-regulation of the
impulse to anger and resentment.

Copyright 2004 Steven
Stosny, Ph. D., all rights reserved
|
|
|
|
 |